View Full Version : Camera suggestions / recommendations?
Eric
May 15th, 2008, 02:27 PM
I've needed a "good" camera for some time now and we're about to start building a house so it's a good excuse to buy a nice camera finally. Here are the features I'm looking for:
An actual view finder, not just the lcd screen
Reasonable optical zoom, 8x+ or so, not interested in the digital zoom crap
Macro mode... couldn't believe my last "bargain" camera didn't have it.
Image stabilization (photo is a must, video would be nice)
Capable of taking legible images in low lighting without blurring the crap out of the photo
Video w/ sound (preferably with image stabilization as well) that will record until it fills the card. I hate cameras that only record for a few seconds. Would be nice if playback has sound. Recording w/sound is a must (my first camera had no sound, aargh!), the video image stabilization and audio playback would be nice.
Something that starts up quickly, I'm tired of waiting for it to boot up only to miss what I wanted to take a picture of.
15fps or so rapid shots, for when you want to capture the whole entertaining wipeout in a series of shots
Still reasonably automated "point and shoot" capability, not particularly interested in the professional level of manual tweaking
It'll be used primarily outdoors, so something you'd feel comfortable taking on a cold, rainy wheelin' trip.
Doesn't need to be super compact, I'm ok with carrying a bigger camera. Function > Form in this case.DSLR is out of my reach, the budget is closer to the $400 or less range. Any suggestions?
Tiffany
May 15th, 2008, 02:38 PM
Canon G9. Close the thread that's all you need ;)
Ghettojeep
May 15th, 2008, 02:52 PM
Yup that's a good one. :thumbsup:
OrangeCrush
May 15th, 2008, 02:58 PM
thats what I have
-Done
Ghettojeep
May 15th, 2008, 03:05 PM
Can it do the video features that he is looking for?
snicho
May 15th, 2008, 03:46 PM
I have the Nikon P5000 (think the newer version is a different number) and love it. It won't do the FPS that you want, but I've been very impressed with it in the year that I've owned it. I'm complimented all of the time on the image quality. Obviously the G9 is a great camera and might have some features mine doesn't, but thought I'd give you another to look at.
Here's a couple of recent pictures:
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa30/snicho_2007/Nilesridingbike-colored.jpg
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa30/snicho_2007/capital-sepia.jpg
bsaunder
May 15th, 2008, 04:32 PM
Most any point and shoot will do the majority of what you want for the price that you want - with the exceptions in bold, your either going to need film or a really good DSLR
I've needed a "good" camera for some time now and we're about to start building a house so it's a good excuse to buy a nice camera finally. Here are the features I'm looking for:
An actual view finder, not just the lcd screen
Reasonable optical zoom, 8x+ or so, not interested in the digital zoom crap
Macro mode... couldn't believe my last "bargain" camera didn't have it.
Image stabilization (photo is a must, video would be nice)
Capable of taking legible images in low lighting without blurring the crap out of the photo
Video w/ sound (preferably with image stabilization as well) that will record until it fills the card. I hate cameras that only record for a few seconds. Would be nice if playback has sound. Recording w/sound is a must (my first camera had no sound, aargh!), the video image stabilization and audio playback would be nice.
Something that starts up quickly, I'm tired of waiting for it to boot up only to miss what I wanted to take a picture of.
15fps or so rapid shots, for when you want to capture the whole entertaining wipeout in a series of shots
Still reasonably automated "point and shoot" capability, not particularly interested in the professional level of manual tweaking
It'll be used primarily outdoors, so something you'd feel comfortable taking on a cold, rainy wheelin' trip.
Doesn't need to be super compact, I'm ok with carrying a bigger camera. Function > Form in this case.DSLR is out of my reach, the budget is closer to the $400 or less range. Any suggestions?
The low light and legible requires as large of a sensor as you can get, more mega pixels won't necessarily help this. All of the point and shoots that I know of have pretty small sensors.
The FPS, the best DSLRs out there are barely reaching that. For $400, I think 3-5fps is going to be the best you can get unless you go into video mode and then it will probably be ~15fps, but the image quality will be lower.
for point and shoots - I'm partial to canons, but also like the nikons and a couple of the sonys.
~tc~
May 15th, 2008, 10:15 PM
Canon Powershot A650IS - same sensor and lens as the G9, about $100 cheaper.
I have the older version, an A610 and LOVE it. The tilt/swivel screen is VERY handy. FULL manual controls, including shutterspeeds up to 15 seconds
Pictures taken with it:
www.4wheelingoh.shutterfly.com/action
Video is 30 fps:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGt2ZwFZKPU
Hardcor4x4
May 15th, 2008, 10:44 PM
Maybe an advanced SLR-"like" point and shoot camera like the Canon S5 IS or Olympus SP 570 UZ?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830120207
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830111197
gobs of optical zoom and all the features your looking for and along the lines of a "good" camera.
Both have ISO speeds of 6200 for shooting in near darkness if you want and getting a good clear shot.
Rhino95
May 16th, 2008, 06:52 PM
Maybe an advanced SLR-"like" point and shoot camera like the Canon S5 IS or Olympus SP 570 UZ?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830120207
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830111197
gobs of optical zoom and all the features your looking for and along the lines of a "good" camera.
Both have ISO speeds of 6200 for shooting in near darkness if you want and getting a good clear shot.
Kinda what I was thinking too.
~tc~
May 16th, 2008, 11:02 PM
Ummm ... unless you're talking about the D3, ISO's over 1000 and "good clear shot" shouldn't be used in the same sentence... just because a camera has a high ISO setting doesn't mean it's actually usable.
Rhino95
May 17th, 2008, 12:28 AM
Yeah, a p&s prolly won't givr you the best results at 6400 ISO...Unless you're printing stamp sized pictures.
Eric
May 19th, 2008, 04:42 PM
Thanks for all the suggestions :beer: I'll check them all out and let you know which I end up with.
Eric
June 23rd, 2008, 09:11 PM
Monica bought me the G9 for my upcoming b-day :D :thumbsup:
Jeffro600
June 23rd, 2008, 11:34 PM
Good deal...a fine camera that will serve you well!
newracer
June 23rd, 2008, 11:41 PM
Love my G9, I think you will too. :thumbsup:
Ghettojeep
June 24th, 2008, 12:19 AM
Monica bought me the G9 for my upcoming b-day :D :thumbsup:
Great little camera. I was hanging out w/ my pop's who is a ridicoulous photographer, and I noticed something new that he was playing with during our last arts festival that we did together...
G9... lol.
Matt
June 24th, 2008, 12:32 AM
G9, S5, A650..... bottom line - think Cannon.
Jeff Mason
June 24th, 2008, 11:48 AM
Take a look at the Panasonic (Lumix) FZ-18 (8 megapixels). It has comparable features to the G9 (but no external flash) and an 18x optical zoom. I like mine a lot.
www.DPreview.com can show you a side -by - side comparison of features.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.