PDA

View Full Version : The Senate ethics committee has once again done what is does best: nothing.


Sound_Man
May 8th, 2008, 09:18 PM
wow...

WASHINGTON ? The Senate Ethics Committee declined Thursday to investigate Sen. David Vitter, who was linked to an escort service whose owner was convicted in federal court and subsequently committed suicide.
The committee said it declined to pursue the case because Vitter's conduct preceded his Senate service, did not result in charges against him and did not involve use of his public office or status for improper purposes.
In a letter to Vitter, R-La., the committee also took note of the first term senator's July 2007 statement when he said, "This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible."
Vitter has acknowledged that his Washington phone number was among those called several years ago by the escort service run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, known as the "D.C. Madam." Palfrey committed suicide earlier this month, saying in notes that she couldn't bear going to prison.
The senator was spared further embarrassment when he was not called as a witness in Palfrey's trial. She was convicted of money laundering, using the mail for illegal purposes and racketeering.
The committee of three Democrats and three Republicans said it made no factual findings on Vitter's conduct. The senators added that their dismissal "should not be taken as personal ... acceptance" of Vitter's actions.
"In fact, if proven to be true, the members of the committee would find the alleged conduct of solicitation for prostitution to be reprehensible," the letter to Vitter stated.
The committee said it reserved the right to reopen an investigation if new allegations surfaced.
The complaint seeking an investigation was filed by a congressional watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
The organization's deputy director, Naomi Seligman, said, "The Senate ethics committee has once again done what is does best: nothing.
"He walks away without even a slap on the wrist."
The committee's formal name is the Senate Select Committee on Ethics.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354656,00.html

1BGDOG
May 8th, 2008, 09:48 PM
I think it is total BS that a ladies life was ruined and ended in her death while politicians have admitted to using her services and walking.

Steve
May 8th, 2008, 10:06 PM
I'm amazed the Dems would pass up a chance to investigate a Republican.

1BGDOG
May 8th, 2008, 10:10 PM
I'm amazed the Dems would pass up a chance to investigate a Republican.


They have to protect their own..scum all of them.

Steve
May 8th, 2008, 10:18 PM
They have to protect their own..scum all of them.

Sad but true.

mkbruin
May 9th, 2008, 08:40 AM
Yeah, damn those evil republicans! Look, you should be more outraged over William 'cold as ice' Jefferson, Diane 'no-bid contract' Feinstien, Harry 'land deal' Reid, John 'earmark threat' Murtha.... need I go on?

They are all dirty, and all need to be tossed out on their butts.

Gags
May 9th, 2008, 12:09 PM
Corrupted by the power.

Jake_Blues
May 9th, 2008, 12:15 PM
"We checked this out, but since all of our numbers were on the list too, we found it difficult to enter into evidence. Case dismissed!"

-E

TwoDogs
May 9th, 2008, 01:13 PM
They have to protect their own..scum all of them.



How true...

deadjeep
May 9th, 2008, 03:04 PM
I think it is total BS that a ladies life was ruined and ended in her death while politicians have admitted to using her services and walking.

She chose the lifestyle.
She bought the rope.


In the scheme of things I think a politician going to a hooker is meaningless.

Let's take care of the crimes and schemes they commit that affect the people they are supposed to be representing. As long as he used his money to pay it's not my concern. If he expensed it out of tax funds, fry him.

theirishavenger
May 9th, 2008, 03:45 PM
In other news.......the Senate has an Ethics Committee? :rolleyes:

ni0h
May 10th, 2008, 12:33 AM
It certainly is convenient for a lot of very powerful men that this woman can never testify.

That is all.

Steve
May 10th, 2008, 11:08 AM
It certainly is convenient for a lot of very powerful men that this woman can never testify.

That is all.

Um, she already testified. The trial is over and she was convicted. :shrug:

OrangeCrush
May 10th, 2008, 11:16 AM
Um, she already testified. The trial is over and she was convicted. :shrug:

Steve why must you bring this type of logic into a nicely crafted rant against the man?

Steve
May 10th, 2008, 11:32 AM
Steve why must you bring this type of logic into a nicely crafted rant against the man?

Dammit, thanks for reminding me. I keep forgetting that pesky facts just destroy a good rant. Sorry. I'll try to do better in the future. :D

1BGDOG
May 10th, 2008, 06:59 PM
She chose the lifestyle.
She bought the rope.


In the scheme of things I think a politician going to a hooker is meaningless.

Let's take care of the crimes and schemes they commit that affect the people they are supposed to be representing. As long as he used his money to pay it's not my concern. If he expensed it out of tax funds, fry him.

But it is a two way street being a John is illegal and he got off scot free!!