PDA

View Full Version : I, for one, would not hit it. But I'd have permission to.


sweater
March 7th, 2008, 04:30 PM
http://www.planetbantz.com/imghost/co4x4/030708cuckold.jpg

Not only is this guy unafraid of his his wife's stare, but he's willing to be represented by the lead singer of Midnight Oil or something:
A former Pueblo police officer who said he was fired because he and his wife have a "cuckold" relationship will receive a $20,000 settlement from the city, the Pueblo city attorney's office said today. (http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/mar/05/cuckold-ex-cop-wife-settle-pueblo-20000/)

Michael and Tammy Bethel filed a federal lawsuit last year. In it, they said that Tammy Bethel is free to have sex with other people, as long as they are not married or minors, and provided she tells her husband about it.

Michael Bethel is not allowed to have sex with others, though he sometimes joins his wife when she is with others, the lawsuit stated.
- mike

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 04:42 PM
Nice of her to dress up for court.

jdogg4
March 7th, 2008, 04:46 PM
O ya she could have gone with the short skirt but reserved her self to just the belly shirt. Nice rack distracts from the crazy eyes.

potter
March 7th, 2008, 04:52 PM
Wouldn't your wife actually have to be attractive for that "agreement" to even be considered?


/hides in case michael bethel is on this forum

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 04:52 PM
That woman is a Restraining Order waiting to happen.

ni0h
March 7th, 2008, 04:54 PM
If a policeman intentionally disregards all self-respect, how can he function in his primary capacity?

I mean, if he got those pathetic facial piercings, he'd have to go, and this takes away all respect for him even without seeing his face.

JKTODD
March 7th, 2008, 04:54 PM
Where's Rex?:shrug:

DaJudge
March 7th, 2008, 04:55 PM
An earlier pic of her from the Pueblo Chieftain:

http://www.chieftain.com/archive/2006/jun/17/newsTammyBethel.jpg

Big Kev
March 7th, 2008, 04:56 PM
So is the guy the pimp?

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 04:59 PM
......I......er.....what's the point of marriage again? :confused:

sweater
March 7th, 2008, 04:59 PM
An earlier pic of her from the Pueblo Chieftain:

http://www.chieftain.com/archive/2006/jun/17/newsTammyBethel.jpg

No bad, IMHO. In a 1983 Flashdance sort of way.

- mike

/still waiting on confirmation of hittable potentiality from Rex

theirishavenger
March 7th, 2008, 05:06 PM
Looks like the Runaway Bride's sister.

RebelRescuer
March 7th, 2008, 05:09 PM
You mean for once its not the cop doing the cheating on his wife?

Huh.

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 05:12 PM
That garden hoe puts a bad taste in my mouth just looking at her. Blech. Blech blech blech.

Why would you want to sleep with that? I bet there's an entire city of critters with a thriving economy in that chick's pants.

gpn911
March 7th, 2008, 05:15 PM
Lots more to that story. Allegedly the Police ended up with a video of him, her and another guy and they fired him. Not for participating in the video. The other guy was arrested for some other reason and Bethel tried to persuade him not to reveal his relationship to the Police. I think they said tampering with a witness.
The pic from the paper is from a Adult magazine she posed in.

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:16 PM
Why do chicks who love nasty sex always raise the ire of other women?

sweater
March 7th, 2008, 05:23 PM
Why do chicks who love nasty sex always bring out the blatant jealousy in other women?

Fixed that for ya. :beer:

- mike

/hot date tonight

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:26 PM
Fixed that for ya. :beer:

- mike

/hot date tonight

Quoted for Truth.

[Mean old lady voice] "Paris Hilton is such a tramp/skank. I bet she has a million diseases!!!!! [/Mean old lady voice]

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 05:30 PM
Why do chicks who love nasty sex always raise the ire of other women?

Cuz they're $kanks. It's really, really, really easy to be that way as a woman. You can walk in a bar, and walk right back out ten seconds later with multiple willing participants trailing behind you no matter what you look like, as long as you're going to put out. I have trouble respecting men and women alike that lack self respect.

That and you yourself stated a huge difference. You said "chicks" when referring to sluts, and "women" when referring to the better half of us. We real women don't have to dress like hookers to get a real man. "Chicks" are only capable of obtaining boys and man whores.

Steve
March 7th, 2008, 05:30 PM
Why would you want to sleep with that?

Who said anything about sleeping with her? :confused:

:P

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 05:32 PM
Nobody has said anything about sleeping with her. :P

That's right. I forget y'all around here are just a bunch of dudes barking at the end of your chains anyways. LOL. :flipoff2:

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:34 PM
Cuz they're $kanks. It's really, really, really easy to be that way as a woman. You can walk in a bar, and walk right back out ten seconds later with multiple willing participants trailing behind you no matter what you look like, as long as you're going to put out. I have trouble respecting men and women alike that lack self respect.

That and you yourself stated a huge difference. You said "chicks" when referring to sluts, and "women" when referring to the better half of us. We real women don't have to dress like hookers to get a real man. "Chicks" are only capable of obtaining boys and man whores.

Hook, line, and sinker.

That was way too easy.

:flipoff2:

RebelRescuer
March 7th, 2008, 05:36 PM
A cop friend of mine was screwing around with a mess like her and ended up at the doc's office with a giant q-tip in his weewee.

Mmmm, now that sounds like fun! :barf:

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 05:39 PM
Hook, line, and sinker.

That was way too easy.

:flipoff2:

You're right. I'm just jealous of her. I mean, hell....what do I have in comparison? A wonderful marriage....an amazing husband....I've never been to court to get permission to screw my neighbor......and I don't have STD's.

She's my idol. :rolleyes:

SPY
March 7th, 2008, 05:39 PM
Ever wonder who's behind your local glory hole?

JKTODD
March 7th, 2008, 05:40 PM
Hook, line, and sinker.

That was way too easy.

:flipoff2:

:lmao:

Trango
March 7th, 2008, 05:44 PM
I'm just wondering how ashamed the couple will be to have a four wheeling community debate their morality and personal worth.

You know, they do what turns them on. :thumbsup:

Trango
March 7th, 2008, 05:46 PM
Ever wonder who's behind your local glory hole?

http://www.google.com/images?q=tbn:sA1lDdMVMuQJ:www.astralbuoyancy.com/02/news/uploads/2007/10/toothless.JPG

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:47 PM
Chicks are the same way with skinny chicks.

[Mean old lady voice] "She's too skinny. I bet she throws up after every meal, blah, blah, <while chomping on Jumbo French Fries> [/Mean old lady voice]

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:48 PM
http://www.google.com/images?q=tbn:sA1lDdMVMuQJ:www.astralbuoyancy.com/02/news/uploads/2007/10/toothless.JPG

OK, I'm officially disturbed.

Not sure whether SPY or Trango is the cause, but I'm definitely disturbed not only by the whole Glory Hole reference, but the photo...........

That's some funny stuff, right there.

JKTODD
March 7th, 2008, 05:48 PM
Chicks are the same way with skinny chicks.

[Mean old lady voice] "She's too skinny. I bet she throws up after every meal, blah, blah, <while chomping on Jumbo French Fries> [/Mean old lady voice]

:stirpot:

You're feeling ornery today aren't you?:D

Steve
March 7th, 2008, 05:50 PM
Chicks are the same way with all other chicks.

Fixed it for ya. ;)

Edit: In fact, since a distinction's been made, I'll add: Women are the same way with all other women, and girls are the same way with all other girls. :D

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:51 PM
:stirpot:

You're feeling ornery today aren't you?:D

No pot stirring at all.

Tell me I'm not right on the money, here. :D :D :D

Leon Phelps
March 7th, 2008, 05:51 PM
You are. Good shit indeed.

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:52 PM
Fixed it for ya. ;)

You know, you're right.

<catfight!> MEOW!

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 05:52 PM
I'm just wondering how ashamed the couple will be to have a four wheeling community debate their morality and personal worth.

You know, they do what turns them on. :thumbsup:

Nice mantality. I love how anything and everything goes in this society. But whatever, the end result is we now have courts that stipulate "adultery" is OK as long as both partners agree it's OK, and then the next divorce case comes in and someone loses custody of their kids/assets because they committed adultery. It would've been appropriate for the court to mandate they get a divorce since there's nothing about their relationship that even remotely resembles a real marriage. Divorce 'em, then they can do whatever the hell they want without wasting the valuable time of our courts deciding who can screw who.

Sorry, I'm bitter today. I'm just sick of how society puts no value or importance on the sanctity of marriage. But then again my personal beliefs always seem to get in the way of a true liberal attitude on my part.

Out of pure curiosity, how would everyone feel about this same situation if these two model citizens had children?

Trango
March 7th, 2008, 05:53 PM
You want disturbed? Look what I just found.

This is the stuff that is really really weird. It's like the guys who amputate because... because I DON'T WANT TO KNOW AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://picasaweb.google.com/dentureman05/MyToothlessMouthAndDenture

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:54 PM
Man-tality.

Actually, that's a good one.

Steve
March 7th, 2008, 05:56 PM
Nice ...the end result is we now have courts that stipulate "adultery" is OK...

I would never defend adultery and personally think it's the height of disrespect in a marriage, but I don't believe that it's against the law anywhere in the U.S., so why wouldn't a court declare it "OK?" :shrug:

scottycards
March 7th, 2008, 05:57 PM
You want disturbed? Look what I just found.

This is the stuff that is really really weird. It's like the guys who amputate because... because I DON'T WANT TO KNOW AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://picasaweb.google.com/dentureman05/MyToothlessMouthAndDenture

On that note, I'm going to wipe the tears that are streaming down my face, exit my office, try to get those images out of my head (WTF- the plastic "lip spreader?????"), and go sit in traffic.

Trango, you come up with some grade A stuff, sometimes.

Twisted, truly twisted. :thumbsup:

CherryokeeXJ
March 7th, 2008, 06:01 PM
I would never defend adultery and personally think it's the height of disrespect in a marriage, but I don't believe that it's against the law anywhere in the U.S., so why wouldn't a court declare it "OK?" :shrug:

Why is our court system's time being utilized towards declaring who can screw who? That's where my problem with it comes in.

"Well, we have nothing else to do today, so let's take our fawked up little situation that we both agree to anyways to court just to make a headline?"

Sick.

JKTODD
March 7th, 2008, 06:08 PM
I can say with conviction that Colorado is a no fault state as far as audultery is concerned! :D

MonkeyBomb
March 7th, 2008, 07:35 PM
Actually adultery is illegal in Colorado but there is no penalty for it.

18-6-501. Adultery.
Statute text
Any sexual intercourse by a married person other than with that person's spouse is adultery, which is prohibited.

History
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 449, ? 1. C.R.S. 1963: ? 40-6-501.

DaJudge
March 7th, 2008, 07:46 PM
Actually adultery is illegal in Colorado but there is no penalty for it.

18-6-501. Adultery.
Statute text
Any sexual intercourse by a married person other than with that person's spouse is adultery, which is prohibited.

History
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 449, ? 1. C.R.S. 1963: ? 40-6-501.
18-6-501. Adultery. (http://198.187.128.12/colorado/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1da268e1.69200c34.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%2718-6-501%27%5D)

Statute text

Any sexual intercourse by a married person other than with that person's spouse is adultery, which is prohibited.
History

Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 449, ? 1. C.R.S. 1963: ? 40-6-501.
Annotations

Am. Jur.2d. See 2 Am. Jur.2d, Adultery and Fornication, ?? 3, 4.
C.J.S. See 2 C.J.S., Adultery, ?? 3, 4, 7.
Annotator's note. Since ? 18-6-501 (http://198.187.128.12/colorado/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=COCODE&d=18-6-501&sid=1da268e1.69200c34.0.0#JD_18-6-501) is similar to former C.L. ? 6837, a
relevant case construing that provision has been included in the
annotations to this section.

Purpose of section. This section is designed to prohibit and punish
the disgraceful and scandalous conduct of those who would, by
their evil and immoral example, debase and demoralize
society. People v. Bright, 77 Colo. 563, 238 P. 71 (1925).

BTW it is a crime under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, too.

Steve
March 7th, 2008, 10:24 PM
Actually adultery is illegal in Colorado but there is no penalty for it.

I stand corrected. :hail:

Purpose of section. This section is designed to prohibit and punish
the disgraceful and scandalous conduct of those who would, by
their evil and immoral example, debase and demoralize
society

That's some pretty funny stuff. :laughing:

Bauer
March 7th, 2008, 11:09 PM
That's right. I forget y'all around here are just a bunch of dudes barking at the end of your chains anyways. LOL. :flipoff2:

:lmao:

ruff ruff.. grrrrrrrrrrrrr......:eek:

:beer:

SatansFaith
March 7th, 2008, 11:15 PM
I put no value or importance on something simply because it's sanctioned by the church and/or the state.

It's not marriage that's sacred, IMO, it's the relationship between the couple involved -- but only if that's how their relationship is defined. Personally, I can't separate my heart and my body anymore - love and faithfulness go hand-in-hand; there's not a man out there who holds any interest for me save satan. Beyond that, I have enough insecurity and abandonment issues without being involved in anything other than a monogamous relationship - not to mention the fact that experience is a hell of a teacher. What's more, I've seen both sides of the "adultery" coin and I don't care to ever see either side again. However, with all that said, I don't pretend to be able to tell someone else what is right or wrong for his or her particular relationship.

"Your kink is not my kink" or, more appropriate for a 4x4 forum, "Your miles may vary." (For those with religious leanings, "Judge not lest ye be judged.")

DaJudge
March 7th, 2008, 11:41 PM
"Judge not lest ye be judged.")
If I take that literally, I'm out of a job. :flipoff2:

JR4X
March 8th, 2008, 01:02 AM
My best friend had a deal with his girlfriend. "You can sleep with anyone you want as long she only has a vagina!" His chick slept with alot of girls but no other guys and it worked out for a while. Until she went lezi. True story!

Loki
March 8th, 2008, 01:12 AM
My best friend had a deal with his girlfriend. "You can sleep with anyone you want as long she only has a vagina!" His chick slept with alot of girls but no other guys and it worked out for a while. Until she went lezi. True story!

Got Pics??? :confused:

:D

scottycards
March 8th, 2008, 08:01 AM
"Judge not lest ye be judged.")


How does this apply in relation to Judge Edward Nottingham, the FEDERAL judge that is getting tagged for HOOKERS?????

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D :D :D

Malamute
March 8th, 2008, 09:01 AM
Maybe we should write her a letter. :shrug:

cj7zrcool
March 8th, 2008, 12:20 PM
My best friend had a deal with his girlfriend. "You can sleep with anyone you want as long she only has a vagina!" His chick slept with alot of girls but no other guys and it worked out for a while. Until she went lezi. True story!

What did the dumb ass think would happen? I mean jeez...they have more bells & whistles!! :D