PDA

View Full Version : Super Bowl in London ????


jeeplvr79
October 16th, 2007, 04:38 PM
What do you think about this?

NFL commissioner says Super Bowl may someday be held in London

By CHRIS KAHN, Associated Press Writer
October 15, 2007

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (AP) -- A future Super Bowl champion may someday be crowned overseas in a game witnessed predominantly by a foreign audience, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said.

"There's a great deal of interest in holding a Super Bowl in London," Goodell told reporters Monday. "So we'll be looking at that."

The commissioner said London's new Wembley Stadium would make a great candidate for pro football's biggest matchup, given the enthusiasm overseas for the game.

The NFL has been expanding its overseas presence for years by televising games around the world. It's held preseason games in numerous countries in Europe, Asia, Mexico and Canada, and in 2005, the Arizona Cardinals and San Francisco 49ers played the first regular-season match outside the United States.

The game at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City drew the league's largest crowd to date, 103,467.

On Oct. 28, Wembley will host the first regular-season NFL game outside North America. It took just 90 minutes to sell the first 40,000 tickets for the game between the Miami Dolphins and New York Giants. Goodell said event organizers have sold 95,000 tickets in all.

Goodell spoke about the possibility of a British Super Bowl after a luncheon Monday in Scottsdale sponsored by the host committee for the 2008 Super Bowl in Arizona.

ColoradoSkier
October 16th, 2007, 04:46 PM
I only agree if they have one in Green Bay, Seattle or Denver first.

Yucca-Man
October 16th, 2007, 06:21 PM
I only agree if they have one in Green Bay, Seattle or Denver first.And that's never going to happen until we put a roof on Mile High. Pansy-azzed VIPs don't want to get their tootsies cold...

Steve
October 16th, 2007, 06:56 PM
That makes as much sense as having a U.K. Soccer Tournament in New York City. Which is to say, none at all. Stupid idea IMO.

Budman
October 16th, 2007, 07:51 PM
That is a wrong as two boy dogs going at it...

Conrad
October 16th, 2007, 07:55 PM
That makes as much sense as having a U.K. Soccer Tournament in New York City. Which is to say, none at all. Stupid idea IMO.

x2

denverd0n
October 16th, 2007, 09:55 PM
It's all about the Benjamins. Football is a business and, wrong as it may seem, they'll do it in a heartbeat if they think they can make more money that way.

Oscar
October 16th, 2007, 10:01 PM
Dont see the logic in that. London is how many time zones away? I don't the advertising would be willing to pay for a game shown at some weird time here in the states

cheftyler
October 16th, 2007, 10:01 PM
Ok, having lived in England for a while...IT WON'T MAKE THEM ANY MONEY...fawking idiots! Europeans, especially Brits, think American football is for pussies. There are so many things wrong with this idea I can't even express them all.

sonofmayhem
October 17th, 2007, 11:25 AM
Like said before, play superbowls in the cities that haven't had it yet or in a long time. then expand outwards:D


But based on Cheftyler's remark, maybe they better hold a poll...

denverd0n
October 17th, 2007, 12:54 PM
Europeans, especially Brits, think American football is for pussies.
They sold out 40,000 tickets in an hour and a half. SOMEBODY over there must be interested in watching!!!

ColoradoSkier
October 17th, 2007, 01:29 PM
They sold out 40,000 tickets in an hour and a half. SOMEBODY over there must be interested in watching!!!

Like all the people that supported NFL Europe and made it such a success? :rolleyes:

rch
October 17th, 2007, 02:25 PM
I only agree if they have one in Green Bay, Seattle and Denver first.

Fixed that for ya.

As long as they've had a superbowl in every city where their is a team, then I think it would be okay for them to have it over sea's.